Skip to main content

Tandem Cuff

AI Referenced

Also known as

Double cuff artificial urinary sphincter, tandem artificial urinary sphincter, dual cuff AUS, tandem transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff, sequential cuff placement

Definition

A tandem cuff is a surgical configuration in which two artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) cuffs are placed in series around the urethra to improve continence in patients with stress urinary incontinence, particularly in cases where a single cuff has failed due to urethral atrophy or when there is a high risk of erosion or infection.1 2 This technique involves placing a second urethral cuff either proximal or distal (typically 1-2cm apart) to an existing cuff, with both cuffs connected to a single pressure-regulating balloon and control pump via a Y-shaped adapter.3 4 The tandem configuration aims to provide additional circumferential compression of the urethra, thereby enhancing the occlusive effect and improving continence outcomes in challenging cases.5

Clinical Context

The tandem cuff configuration is primarily used as a salvage procedure in patients who have experienced recurrent stress urinary incontinence following primary artificial urinary sphincter placement.1 This clinical scenario most commonly occurs due to urethral atrophy, which develops when constant circumferential compression of the corpus spongiosum by the AUS leads to tissue thinning over time.4

Patient selection criteria for tandem cuff placement include:

  • Patients with post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence who have failed primary AUS placement5
  • Patients with confirmed urethral atrophy (identified during cystoscopy as incomplete urethral coaptation with device cycling)4
  • Patients with persistent incontinence despite adequate fluid in the AUS system5
  • Cases with high risk of repeat erosion or infection after failed AUS placement2

The surgical implantation process involves placing a second cuff approximately 1-2cm distal or proximal to the existing cuff.4 A Y-shaped adapter is used to connect the pump tubing to both cuffs, and additional fluid (1-3cc) is added to the system to account for the volume sequestered in the second cuff.4 In cases with severely atrophic urethral tissues (measurement <3.5cm), distal urethral tapering, or difficult dissection planes (e.g., in patients with prior pelvic radiation therapy or urethral sling placement), a transcorporal approach may be utilized.2

Clinical outcomes following tandem cuff placement show significant improvement in continence. Studies report a decrease in daily pad use from a median of 5.0 to 2.0 pads (p<0.001),2 with 56-69% of patients requiring 2 or fewer pads daily.2 Patient satisfaction is generally high, with 88-94% of patients reporting they would undergo the procedure again or recommend it to others.1 However, complications can include cuff erosion (approximately 11%) and device infection, particularly in patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.2 3 The 3-year device survival rate is approximately 76%, which is comparable to single cuff downsizing procedures.4

Scientific Citation

[1] DiMarco DS, Elliott DS. Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1252-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000085787.21140.db

[2] Magera JS Jr, Elliott DS. Tandem transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff salvage technique: surgical description and results. J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1015-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.052

[3] Manka MG, Wright EJ. Does Use of a Second Cuff Improve Artificial Urinary Sphincter Effectiveness? Evaluation Using a Comparative Cadaver Model. J Urol. 2015 Dec;194(6):1688-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.102

[4] Linder BJ, Piotrowski JT, Ziegelmann MJ, Rivera ME, Rangel LJ, Elliott DS. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Mar-Apr;43(2):264-270. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0240

[5] Pearlman AM, Rasper AM, Terlecki RP. Exposing the myth of urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter: Comparative analysis of AUS outcomes based on surgical approach and time. Int Neurourol J. 2018 Sep;22(3):275-281. DOI: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.4.275

Related Rigicon Products