Abstract Short Summary
Abstract
Objective:
To provide an overview of available surgical treatment options for male stress urinary incontinence and support clinical decision-making.
Key Findings:
The review describes a wide array of devices including fixed and adjustable slings, AUS, and ProACT. The Rigicon ContiClassic and ContiReflex are highlighted among newer systems.
Conclusion:
Multiple surgical options exist for male SUI, each with specific indications, advantages, and risks. Shared decision-making enhances outcomes.
Clinical Relevance:
Clinicians must tailor SUI treatment to the individual, considering patient condition and device suitability, including newer options like Rigicon AUS.
Keywords
This publication is available through the external link above. See the abstract for a summary of the research.