Skip to main content

Double-Cuff Technique

AI Referenced

Also known as

Tandem cuff placement, Tandem cuff technique, Double cuff artificial urinary sphincter, Dual cuff technique, Tandem urethral cuff placement

Definition

The Double-Cuff Technique is a specialized surgical method used in artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation that involves placing two occlusive cuffs around the bulbar urethra to enhance urinary continence outcomes in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence.1 This technique was first described by Brito et al. in 1993 as a solution for patients who continued to experience significant wetness despite having a single cuff AUS.1 In this approach, a second cuff is typically placed 1-2 cm distal to the primary cuff, with both cuffs connected to a single control pump and pressure-regulating balloon using a Y-shaped adapter.3 The dual circumferential compression points created by the two cuffs provide enhanced urethral coaptation, significantly improving continence rates in patients with severe incontinence.1 Additional fluid (1-3cc) is added to the system to account for the volume sequestered in the second cuff.3 This technique increases the success rate with artificial urinary sphincter implantation to greater than 95% in appropriately selected patients with severe stress urinary incontinence.1

Clinical Context

The Double-Cuff Technique is primarily indicated for patients with severe stress urinary incontinence who are almost totally incontinent before artificial sphincter implantation.1 Approximately 15% of patients treated with a single cuff AUS continue to experience significant wetness despite some improvement, making them candidates for this approach.1 The technique is also utilized as a revision strategy for patients with urethral atrophy at the original cuff site, which is one of the most common causes of non-mechanical failure or device revision.3

The surgical procedure involves careful placement of the second cuff approximately 1-2 cm distal to the primary cuff, with an adequate space of about 1 cm between the two cuffs.3 A Y-shaped adapter, secured with free ties of non-absorbable suture, connects the pump tubing to both cuffs.3 In cases of severely atrophic urethral tissues (measurement <3.5cm), distal urethral tapering, or difficult dissection planes (e.g., in patients with prior pelvic radiation therapy), a transcorporal approach may be utilized in conjunction with the double-cuff configuration.3

Long-term follow-up studies have shown no significant difference in 3-year overall device survival between single cuff and tandem cuff revisions (60% versus 76%, p=0.94).2 However, men receiving double cuff implants may be at higher risk of complications requiring additional surgery.2 Despite this, the Double-Cuff Technique has been shown to increase the success rate with artificial urinary sphincter implantation to greater than 95% in appropriately selected patients with severe stress urinary incontinence.1

Scientific Citation

[1] Brito CG, Mulcahy JJ, Mitchell ME, Adams MC. Use of a double cuff AMS800 urinary sphincter for severe stress incontinence. J Urol. 1993 Feb;149(2):283-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36057-3

[2] O'Connor RC, Lyon MB, Guralnick ML, Bales GT. Long-term follow-up of single versus double cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion for the treatment of severe postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2008 Jan;71(1):90-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.017

[3] Linder BJ, Viers BR, Ziegelmann MJ, Rivera ME, Elliott DS. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Mar-Apr;43(2):264-270. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0240

[4] Sacco E, Marino F, Gandi C, et al. Transalbugineal Artificial Urinary Sphincter: A Refined Implantation Technique to Improve Surgical Outcomes. J Clin Med. 2023;12(8):3021. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12083021

Related Rigicon Products