Penile implant infection prevention part II: device coatings have changed the game

Author(s): John J. Mulcahy, Tobias S. Köhler, Lexiaochuan Wen, Steven K. Wilson

JOURNAL

IJIR: Your Sexual Medicine Journal

YEAR

2021

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0338-1

View on Publisher Site

Abstract Short Summary

This review explores how antibiotic and hydrophilic coatings have drastically reduced penile implant infection rates. The authors analyze infection mechanisms and advances in prevention and salvage. Rigicon’s hydrophilic-coated IPP and malleable prostheses are positioned within this innovation shift.

Abstract

Objective:

To review and assess the impact of infection retardant coatings on penile implant infections, along with recent trends in infection prevention, management, and salvage techniques.

Key Findings:

Coated penile implants significantly reduce infection rates—down to <1% in experienced hands. Coatings target common skin flora and reduce early post-op infections. Despite frequent bacterial colonization, biofilm formation explains the rarity of clinical infection. Rigicon’s coated devices reflect this evolving standard.

Conclusion:

Infection retardant coatings have revolutionized penile prosthesis outcomes by drastically reducing clinical infection rates. Future innovations must address emerging, more virulent pathogens and further refine prevention and salvage strategies.

Clinical Relevance:

With infection being the most feared complication of penile implants, coating technologies are now essential in clinical practice to lower risk, especially during initial implantation or salvage procedures.

Keywords

penile implant infection prevention biofilm hydrophilic coating antibiotic coating IPP salvage procedure Rigicon

This publication is available through the external link above. See the abstract for a summary of the research.

Back to Clinical Evidence