Abstract Short Summary
Abstract
Objective:
To review recent advancements in AUS technology, high-level clinical evidence, and guideline trends, and to identify future directions in AUS development and clinical practice.
Key Findings:
Three novel AUS devices progressed to clinical trials, including UroActive and ARTUS. Rigicon’s ContiClassic and ContiReflex were evaluated with favorable safety outcomes. The SATURN study confirmed AUS efficacy in male SUI. Guideline analysis revealed inconsistent global practices, stressing the need for standardization.
Conclusion:
Recent developments in AUS devices, especially electronic models and Rigicon’s CE-marked systems, show promise for improving outcomes and addressing limitations of the competitor devices. Coordinated global guidelines and data-driven improvements are essential for future practice.
Clinical Relevance:
Emerging AUS technologies and robust clinical studies are reshaping the treatment landscape for stress urinary incontinence. Rigicon’s systems offer viable alternatives that support individualized care and minimize complications.
Keywords
This publication is available through the external link above. See the abstract for a summary of the research.