Skip to main content

Phimosis

AI Referenced
Views: 4

Also Known As

Tight foreskin, preputial stenosis, congenital phimosis, acquired phimosis.

Definition

Phimosis is a condition affecting uncircumcised males where the foreskin (prepuce) is too tight to be retracted (pulled back) from the head (glans) of the penis.¹ It can be physiological, commonly seen in infants and young children, which usually resolves spontaneously with age.² Pathological phimosis, on the other hand, can occur at any age and is often the result of scarring, infection, or inflammation, such as from conditions like balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO), also known as lichen sclerosus.³⁻⁴ The primary purpose of a retractable foreskin is to allow for proper hygiene and comfortable sexual function. In phimosis, the inability to retract the foreskin can lead to difficulties with cleaning, painful erections, and an increased risk of infections.¹

Clinical Context

Phimosis is typically identified during routine physical examinations or when symptoms arise. In children, physiological phimosis is common and often requires no intervention beyond gentle hygiene, as the foreskin naturally becomes retractable over time.² Patient selection for treatment depends on the type and severity of phimosis and the presence of complications. Pathological phimosis, or physiological phimosis persisting into adolescence or adulthood causing symptoms, usually warrants treatment.¹ Symptoms that may necessitate intervention include pain, recurrent infections (balanitis or posthitis), difficulty urinating (such as ballooning of the foreskin during urination)⁵, or interference with sexual activity. Conservative treatment options, particularly for milder cases or in children, include the application of topical corticosteroid creams for 4-8 weeks, which can help soften the foreskin and improve retractability.⁶⁻⁷ Surgical procedures are considered if conservative measures fail or if phimosis is severe or caused by scarring (e.g., BXO).³ Surgical options include preputioplasty (a foreskin-preserving procedure that widens the preputial opening)⁸⁻⁹ or circumcision (complete removal of the foreskin).¹⁰ Expected outcomes after treatment are generally good, with resolution of symptoms and improved hygiene. Recovery from surgical procedures varies but typically involves a few weeks of healing.

Scientific Citation

[1] McGregor TB, Pike JG, Leonard MP. Pathologic and physiologic phimosis: approach to the phimotic foreskin. Can Fam Physician. 2007 Mar;53(3):445-8. PMID: 17872680; PMCID: PMC1949079.

[2] Gairdner D. The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision. Br Med J. 1949 Dec 24;2(4642):1433-7. PMID: 15408299; PMCID: PMC2051968.

[3] Celis S, Reed F, Murphy F, Adams S, Gillick J, Abdelhafeez AH, Lopez PJ. Balanitis xerotica obliterans in children and adolescents: a literature review and clinical series. J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Feb;10(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.09.027. Epub 2013 Oct 26. PMID: 24295833.

[4] Das S, Tunuguntla HS. Balanitis xerotica obliterans--a review. World J Urol. 2000 Dec;18(6):382-7. doi: 10.1007/s003450000130. PMID: 11204255.

[5] Babu R, Harrison SK, Hutton KA. Ballooning of the foreskin and physiological phimosis: is there any objective evidence of obstructed voiding? BJU Int. 2004 Aug;94(3):384-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04935.x. PMID: 15291873.

[6] Yang SS, Tsai YC, Wu CC, Liu SP, Wang CC. Highly potent and moderately potent topical steroids are effective in treating phimosis: a prospective randomized study. J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1361-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000153678.39001.0f. PMID: 15758802.

[7] Makhija D, Shah H, Tiwari C, Dwivedi P, Gandhi S. Outcome of topical steroid application in children with non-retractile prepuce. Dev Period Med. 2018;22(1):71-74. PMID: 29641424; PMCID: PMC8522916.

[8] Benson M, Hanna MK. Prepuce sparing: Use of Z-plasty for treatment of phimosis and scarred foreskin. J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Dec;14(6):545.e1-545.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 Jun 11. PMID: 29909192.

[9] Cuckow PM, Rix G, Mouriquand PD. Preputial plasty: a good alternative to circumcision. J Pediatr Surg. 1994 Apr;29(4):561-3. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90103-x. PMID: 8014816.

[10] Huang C, Song P, Xu C, Wang R, Wei L, Zhao X. Comparative efficacy and safety of different circumcision or preputioplasty techniques for phimosis: A network meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017 Jul;43:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 10. PMID: 28522221.

Related Rigicon Products